Daub

Williams v. Daub

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20243:22-cv-01667California8,486 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN WESLEY WILLIAMS, Case No.: 22-cv-1667-AGS-MMP

Plaintiff,

REPORT AND

v. RECOMMENDATION RE:

BELTRAN, et al., 1. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR Defendants. LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT;

AND

17 2. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

19 [ECF Nos. 30, 43] 20 21 This Report and Recommendation is submitted to United States District Judge Andrew G. Schopler pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Civil Local Rules 72.1(c) and 72.3 of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff John Wesley Williams’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint. [ECF No. 30.] The Court found the motion suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). [ECF No. 31.] While Plaintiff’s motion was under submission, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.