Millete
Millete v. Chula Vista Police Department
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 BENITO LEO MILLETE and Case No.: 22-cv-1343-WQH-BJC
JUDITH I MILLETE,
ORDER Plaintiffs, 11 v.
CHULA VISTA POLICE
DEPARTMENT; CITY OF CHULA VISTA; and DOES 1– 100, 15 Defendants. 16 HAYES, Judge: The matter before the Court is the Ex Parte Request to be Relieved as Counsel and Request for Order to Extend the Deadlines on the Current Order (ECF No. 37) filed by counsel for Plaintiffs Benito Leo Millete and Judith I. Millete (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), Bonita P. Martinez (“Plaintiffs’ Counsel”). I. REQUEST TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL “An attorney may not withdraw as counsel except by leave of court, and the decision to grant or deny counsel’s motion to withdraw is committed to the discretion of the trial court.” Urias v. Labcorp Peri-Approval & Commercialization Inc., No. 23-CV-1815 JLS (MSB), 2023 WL 8845384, at *1 (S.D. Cal. Dec. 21, 2023) (citation omitted); see also United States v. Carter, 560 F.3d 1107, 1113 (9th Cir. 2009); S.D. Cal. Civ.…