Duran

Duran v. The People of the State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 23, 20243:24-cv-01625California1,889 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID B. DURAN, Case No.: 24cv1625 BEN (AHG)

Petitioner,

ORDER DENYING SECOND

v. MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS [ECF No. 6] AS MOOT MR. CLIFFORD DAVIS, et al.,

AND NOTIFYING PETITIONER OF

Respondents. OPTIONS TO AVOID DISMISSAL

OF AMENDED PETITION

16 On September 9, 2024, Petitioner, who indicated he is currently on parole arising from an Imperial County Superior Court judgment of conviction, proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF No. 1.) On September 17, 2024, the Court dismissed the case without prejudice for failure to satisfy the filing fee requirement, failure to name a proper Respondent and failure to allege exhaustion of state judicial remedies. (ECF No. 2.) On September 18, 2024, Petitioner filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 3.) On September 20, 2024, the Court granted Petitioner’s motion but…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.