Greenley

Greenley v. Kochava, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 17, 20243:22-cv-01327California344 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAHNAZ ZARIF and SHERI BATE, Case No. 22-cv-01327-BAS-AHG individually and on behalf of others 12 similarly situated, ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS Plaintiffs, (ECF No. 85) 14 v.

KOCHAVA, INC.,

16 Defendant.

Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) to dismiss the above-captioned action. (ECF No. 85.) Under Rule 41(a)(1), a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss its action by (1) filing a notice of voluntary dismissal before a defendant has filed an answer or moved for summary judgment or (2) filing a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); see also Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Dismissal is effective upon the filing of a notice or stipulation, as described in Rule 41(a)(1)(A), and no court order is required. Stone v. Woodford, No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.