Riddick

Riddick v. Sony Electronics Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 23, 20243:24-cv-00319California338 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BERT RIDDICK, et al., Case No. 24-cv-00319-BAS-JLB

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’

v. JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 46) SONY ELECTRONICS, INC., et al., Defendants. 16

Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) to dismiss the above-captioned action. (ECF No. 46.) Under Rule 41(a)(1), a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss its action by (1) filing a notice of voluntary dismissal before a defendant has filed an answer or moved for summary judgment or (2) filing a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); see also Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Dismissal is effective upon the filing of a notice or stipulation, as described in Rule 41(a)(1)(A), and no court order is required. Stone v. Woodford, No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.