Reed
Reed v. Buckel
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MYCHAL REED, Case No.: 3:24-cv-0179-MMA (AHG)
CDCR #AE-9821
ORDER DISMISSING FIRST
Plaintiff, AMENDED COMPLAINT
PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.
14 §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) & 1915A(b)(1) vs. 15 [Doc. No. 11]
A. BUCKEL, S. STEADMAN, T.
MARTINEZ, B. COLON,
Defendants. 19 I. INTRODUCTION Mychal Reed (“Plaintiff” or “Reed”), an inmate proceeding pro se, is pursuing a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 14, 2024, the Court granted Reed’s request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and dismissed his original complaint for failure to comply with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil and failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) and 1915A(b). Doc. No. 10. The Court granted Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint and he did so on June 11, 2024. Doc. No. 11. For the reasons discussed below, the Court dismisses the FAC for failure to state a claim. / / / …