J.A.M.

J.A.M. v. United States of America

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 24, 20243:22-cv-00380California1,526 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 J.A.M., a minor child; O.A.M., a minor Case No.: 3:22-CV-00380-GPC-BGS child; and THELMA MEDINA 12 NAVARRO, their mother, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO RE-TAX COSTS Plaintiffs,

14 v. [ECF No. 71] 15 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., 16 Defendants.

Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Re-Tax Costs. ECF No. 71. A briefing schedule was set by the Court, ECF No. 72, but the United States did not oppose, and Plaintiffs did not file a reply. For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Motion to Re-tax Costs. FACTUAL BACKGROUND On March 21, 2022, Plaintiffs filed a complaint against the United States for damages arising from the U.S. Customs & Border Protection (“CBP”) detention of the Children-Plaintiffs. ECF 1. Plaintiffs brought claims under the Federal Torts Claims Act (“FTCA”), the Bane Act, and the U.S. Constitution. Id. On May 24, 2024, the United 27 States moved to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.