Grogan

Grogan v. Archwell Holdings LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 25, 20243:24-cv-01618California1,199 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRIAN A. GROGAN, Case No.: 24-CV-1618 JLS (DEB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S EX

PARTE APPLICATION FOR

BIRD ROCK HOME MORTGAGE,

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

LLC, et al., ORDER Defendants. 16 (ECF No. 7) 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Brian Grogan’s Ex Parte Application for an Order to Perform a Declaratory Relief, Temporary Injunction (“TRO Mot.,” ECF No. 7). Having carefully considered Plaintiff’s filing and the applicable law, the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s TRO Motion. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(b) governs the issuance of a temporary restraining order (“TRO”). The standard for a TRO is identical to the standard for a preliminary injunction. Frontline Med. Assocs., Inc. v. Coventry Healthcare Worker’s Comp., Inc., 620 F. Supp. 2d 1109, 1110 (C.D. Cal. 2009). A plaintiff seeking preliminary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.