Pardo

Pardo v. The County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 25, 20243:24-cv-01062California1,108 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRANCISCO S. PARDO, M.D.; Case No.: 24-CV-1062 JLS (SBC)

RICARDO JOAQUIN; FRANCISCO

ORDER CLARIFYING PARDO; MARIA-AMELIA PARDO; and

PLAINTIFFS’ FILING

VICTOR PARDO,

OBLIGATIONS

14 Plaintiffs, (ECF No. 9) 15 v.

THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; REINA

LOPEZ; THOMAS RUFF; LONNIE

LAU; KIM GIARDIA; DHHS

18 DIRECTOR; NICK MACCHIONE; and DOES 1–50,

20 Defendants.

Presently before the Court are Defendant County of San Diego’s (“County”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (“Mot.,” ECF No. 9) and its Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support thereof (“Mem.,” ECF No. 9-1). Plaintiffs failed to oppose the Motion on October 3, 2024, as required by Civil Local Rule 7.1(e)(2), see generally Docket, and the County filed a Notice of Plaintiff’s non-opposition to the Motion on October 10, 2024. See ECF No. 10 (“Not.”). The same day the County filed its Notice, Plaintiffs filed an Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 12) and a 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.