Pardo
Pardo v. The County of San Diego
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRANCISCO S. PARDO, M.D.; Case No.: 24-CV-1062 JLS (SBC)
RICARDO JOAQUIN; FRANCISCO
ORDER CLARIFYING PARDO; MARIA-AMELIA PARDO; and
PLAINTIFFS’ FILING
VICTOR PARDO,
OBLIGATIONS
14 Plaintiffs, (ECF No. 9) 15 v.
THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; REINA
LOPEZ; THOMAS RUFF; LONNIE
LAU; KIM GIARDIA; DHHS
18 DIRECTOR; NICK MACCHIONE; and DOES 1–50,
20 Defendants.
Presently before the Court are Defendant County of San Diego’s (“County”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (“Mot.,” ECF No. 9) and its Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support thereof (“Mem.,” ECF No. 9-1). Plaintiffs failed to oppose the Motion on October 3, 2024, as required by Civil Local Rule 7.1(e)(2), see generally Docket, and the County filed a Notice of Plaintiff’s non-opposition to the Motion on October 10, 2024. See ECF No. 10 (“Not.”). The same day the County filed its Notice, Plaintiffs filed an Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 12) and a 1…