Baeza

Baeza v. Grundowicz

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 29, 20243:24-cv-00999California3,080 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 24-cv-999-DMS-VET

DAVID CHRISTOPHER BAEZA,

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ v. MOTION TO DISMISS

OFFICER GRUNDOWICZ, CHIEF OF

POLICE KENDRICK SADLER,

SERGEANT JUSTIN PECCHIA,

COUNCILMAN PETER WEISS, CITY

ATTORNEY NELSON CANDELARIO,

RISK MANAGEMENT MANAGER

DENISE GALLEGOS, and CITY OF

OCEANSIDE

19 Defendants.

21 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint 22 (Complaint, ECF No. 1) under Rule 12(b)(6). (Defendants’ Motion, ECF No. 15). 23 Plaintiff Baeza, proceeding pro se, filed a response in opposition (Plaintiff’s Opposition, 24 ECF No. 16) and Defendants filed a reply. (ECF No. 18). The Court found this matter to 25 be suitable for resolution without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). 26 (ECF No. 19). For the following reasons, Defendants’ Motion is granted. 27 28 I. BACKGROUND 2 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.