Baeza
Baeza v. Grundowicz
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 29, 20243:24-cv-00999California3,080 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 24-cv-999-DMS-VET
DAVID CHRISTOPHER BAEZA,
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ v. MOTION TO DISMISS
OFFICER GRUNDOWICZ, CHIEF OF
POLICE KENDRICK SADLER,
SERGEANT JUSTIN PECCHIA,
COUNCILMAN PETER WEISS, CITY
ATTORNEY NELSON CANDELARIO,
RISK MANAGEMENT MANAGER
DENISE GALLEGOS, and CITY OF
OCEANSIDE
19 Defendants.
21 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint 22 (Complaint, ECF No. 1) under Rule 12(b)(6). (Defendants’ Motion, ECF No. 15). 23 Plaintiff Baeza, proceeding pro se, filed a response in opposition (Plaintiff’s Opposition, 24 ECF No. 16) and Defendants filed a reply. (ECF No. 18). The Court found this matter to 25 be suitable for resolution without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). 26 (ECF No. 19). For the following reasons, Defendants’ Motion is granted. 27 28 I. BACKGROUND 2 …