Hook
Hook v. Roddy
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTINA RITTER HOOK, Case No.: 24-CV-1939 JLS (KSC)
Petitioner,
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE
MICHAEL RODDY, et al., Respondents. 16 Presently before the Court is pro se Petitioner Christina Ritter Hook’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Pet.,” ECF No. 1), filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. For the reasons discussed below, the Court dismisses the case without prejudice. FAILURE TO SATISFY THE FILING FEE REQUIREMENT Petitioner has failed to pay the $5.00 filing fee and has failed to move to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court cannot proceed until Petitioner has either paid the $5.00 filing fee or has qualified to proceed in forma pauperis. See R. 3(a), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases (2019). Accordingly, the instant case is subject to dismissal for failure to satisfy the filing fee requirement. BASIS FOR PETITION In the …