Embry

B&G Foods North America, Inc. v. Embry

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 30, 20243:24-cv-01779California950 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 B&G FOODS NORTH AMERICA, Case No.: 24-cv-1779-AJB-MMP

INC.,

ORDER TRANSFERRING NON-

Plaintiff, PARTY CRAIG NICHOLAS’ v. MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE

ORDER AND/OR TO QUASH

KIM EMBRY, and ENVIRONMENTAL SUBPOENA HEALTH ADVOCATES, INC. acting as

enforcement representatives under [ECF No. 1] California Proposition 65 on behalf of the 19 State of California, 20 Defendant. 21 22 Currently pending before the Court is non-party Craig Nicholas, Esq.’s (“Nicholas”) Consent to and Request to Transfer Motion for Protective Order And/or To Quash Subpoena to E.D. Cal. Under Rule 45(f). [ECF No. 1.] This Court previously granted a similar request on behalf of Mr. Jake Schulte to transfer a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 45(f) to be adjudicated by the Eastern District of California based on Mr. Schulte’s consent. [S.D. Cal No. 24-cv-1778-AJB-MMP, ECF No. 2-1.] …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.