Yablonsky

Yablonsky v. Alford

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 25, 20243:23-cv-02235California1,686 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN HENRY YABLONSKY, Case No.: 23-cv-2235-RSH-JLB

CDCR #AL-0373,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

Plaintiff, RECONSDIERATION v. 14 [ECF No. 12] ALFORD, Teacher, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Before the Court is the Plaintiff’s “Objection to Judgment” [ECF No. 12], which the Court liberally construes as a motion for reconsideration. For the reasons below, the Court denies Plaintiff’s motion. I. BACKGROUND On December 4, 2023, Plaintiff John Henry Yablonsky, a state inmate proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. ECF No. 1. He claimed that while housed at the R.J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) in San Diego, California, Defendants negligently and in violation of the Eighth Amendment failed to protect him from exposure to Covid-19, provided less access to the law library than other inmates in violation of equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment, and falsely charged him with a disciplinary infraction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.