Corbett
Corbett v. PharmaCare U.S., Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MONTIQUENO CORBETT, individually Case No.: 3:21-cv-00137-JES-AHG and on behalf of all others similarly 12 situated, et al., ORDER RESOLVING OPPOSED JOINT MOTION FOR Plaintiffs,
CONTINUANCE
14 v. [ECF No. 245]
PHARMACARE U.S., INC.,
16 Defendant. 17 18 19 20 21 Before the Court is the parties’ Opposed Joint Motion regarding Plaintiffs’ Application for an Extension of Expert Deadlines. ECF No. 245. Plaintiffs seek a continuance of the merits expert report deadlines, which Defendant opposes. Id. Parties seeking to continue deadlines in the scheduling order, or other deadlines set forth by the Court, must demonstrate good cause. FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b)(4) (“A schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent”); see also ECF No. 214 at 6 (Scheduling Order, stating that “[t]he dates [] set forth herein will not be modified except for good cause shown”); Chmb.R. at 2 (stating that…