People v. Vanderbilt CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 31, 2024A168636California3,295 words

Opinion

Opinion

Petrou, J.

Filed 10/31/24 P. v. Vanderbilt CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A168636

v. SHAKIA RAYNIQUE (San Mateo County VANDERBILT, Super. Ct. No. 20-SF-008144-A) Defendant and Appellant.

The trial court sentenced Shakia Raynique Vanderbilt to 32 months in prison after she pled no contest to fleeing a pursuing peace officer while driving recklessly and admitted a prior serious or violent strike conviction under Penal Code section 1170.12, subdivision (c)(1).1 Vanderbilt argues the trial court erred by denying her motion under People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996) 13 Cal.4th 497 (Romero) to dismiss the prior strike. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.