Rodriguez

Rodriguez v. Andy Gump CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 31, 2024B325527California6,722 words

Opinion

Opinion

Adams, J.

Filed 10/31/24 Rodriguez v. Andy Gump CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

LEOBARDO RODRIGUEZ, B325527

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 19STCV18355) v.

ANDY GUMP, INC., et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Stephanie M. Bowick, Judge. Affirmed. Gary Rand & Suzanne E. Rand-Lewis and Suzanne E. Rand-Lewis for Plaintiff and Appellant. Myers, Widders, Gibson, Jones & Feingold and Jill L. Friedman for Defendants and Respondents.

‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗ Plaintiff and appellant Leobardo Rodriguez appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered pursuant to its order issuing terminating sanctions.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.