Rodriguez
Rodriguez v. Andy Gump CA2/3
Opinion
Opinion
Adams, J.
Filed 10/31/24 Rodriguez v. Andy Gump CA2/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
LEOBARDO RODRIGUEZ, B325527
Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 19STCV18355) v.
ANDY GUMP, INC., et al.,
Defendants and Respondents.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Stephanie M. Bowick, Judge. Affirmed. Gary Rand & Suzanne E. Rand-Lewis and Suzanne E. Rand-Lewis for Plaintiff and Appellant. Myers, Widders, Gibson, Jones & Feingold and Jill L. Friedman for Defendants and Respondents.
‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗ Plaintiff and appellant Leobardo Rodriguez appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered pursuant to its order issuing terminating sanctions.…