William Scollard v. State Farm General Insurance Company

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 1, 202423-55747California858 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 1 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILLIAM SCOLLARD, No. 23-55747 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:21-cv-06145-PSG-PVC v.

MEMORANDUM*

STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Philip S. Gutierrez, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 23, 2024 Pasadena, California

Before: TALLMAN, R. NELSON, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

William Scollard sued State Farm after it denied his insurance claim alleging

that two antique items, worth $126,000, were stolen from his vehicle. The district

court granted summary judgment to State Farm, finding that Scollard’s suit was

time-barred under the homeowners policy’s one-year limitation period. Scollard

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. appealed. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

1. On appeal, Scollard argues that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.