People v. Rayman CA4/1

STATEMENT OF FACTS

In his change of plea, Rayman stated: “On or about November 10, 2022, I did commit an assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury and I also possessed ammunition after being prohibited from doing so based on a prior conviction. I also admit my strike prior conviction from 12/3/18 for PC245(a)(1).”

DISCUSSION

As we have noted, appellate counsel has filed a Wende brief and asks the court to independently review the record for error. To assist the court in its review, and in compliance with Anders v California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders), counsel has identified two possible issues that were considered in evaluating the potential merits of this appeal: 1. Whether trial counsel’s failure to file a motion to withdraw Rayman’s guilty plea was ineffective assistance of counsel. 2. Whether the trial court erred in denying the Marsden motion.

2 We have reviewed the record as required by Wende and Anders. We have not discovered any arguable issues for reversal on appeal. Competent counsel has represented Rayman on this appeal.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

HUFFMAN, J.

WE CONCUR:

McCONNELL, P. J.

RUBIN, J.

3