Rosas Roman v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 4, 202423-2591California897 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 4 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIA DEL CARMEN ROSAS No. 23-2591 ROMAN; YERENI BRISSEID BAUTISTA Agency Nos.

ROSAS; BRIAN ELIAS BAUTISTA A201-742-141

ROSAS, A201-742-142

A201-742-143

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted October 22, 2024 San Francisco, California

Before: OWENS, SUNG, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Maria Del Carmen Rosas Roman (“Petitioner”) and her two derivative minor

children, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision dismissing their appeal from an

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying asylum, withholding of removal, and

protection…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.