Joy Scherer v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 4, 202423-55603California410 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

NOV 4 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOY HO SCHERER, No. 23-55603

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 8:22-cv-01931-JVS-ADS v.

CITY OF LOS ANGELES; et al., MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California James V. Selna, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 25, 2024 Pasadena, California

Before: IKUTA and BRESS, Circuit Judges, and BASTIAN,** District Judge.

Plaintiff Joy Ho Scherer appeals from the district court’s order granting a

motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) in favor of the City of Los Angeles and Los

Angeles Police Department officers (Wessam Ismail, Nelson Martinez, Jr., and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Stanley A. Bastian, Chief United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Washington, sitting by designation. unknown Doe officers). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.