Valois

Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company v. Valois

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 5, 202423-3286California663 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 5 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT No. 23-3286 INSURANCE COMPANY, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-06469-RS Plaintiff,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MARILYNE VALOIS,

Defendant-Cross-Claimant - Appellant,

v.

HAILI KOWALSKI,

Defendant-Cross-Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Richard G. Seeborg, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 24, 2024 San Francisco, California

Before: OWENS, SUNG, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Marilyne Valois appeals from the district court’s summary judgment in

favor of Haili Kowalski in this interpleader action concerning the proceeds of a life

insurance policy administered by the Hartford Life and Accident Insurance

Company (“Hartford Plan”). The district court held the Legal Separation

Agreement…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.