Daniel Chung v. County of Santa Clara

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 5, 202423-16103California1,729 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 5 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANIEL CHUNG, an individual, No. 23-16103

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-07583-AMO

v.

MEMORANDUM*

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, a public entity,

Defendant,

and

JEFFREY F. ROSEN, individually,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Araceli Martinez-Olguin, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 9, 2024 San Francisco, California

Before: H.A. THOMAS and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges, and SIMON,** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Michael H. Simon, United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation. The district court dismissed all claims asserted by Plaintiff Daniel Chung

(“Chung”) against Defendant County of Santa Clara (“County”). Finding claim

preclusion, the district court also granted summary judgment in favor of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.