Abraham

Abraham v. State Farm General Insurance Company

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 5, 202423-2776California945 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 5 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LIOR ABRAHAM, No. 23-2776 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 4:22-cv-01600-JST v.

MEMORANDUM*

STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jon S. Tigar, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 21, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: GILMAN***, WARDLAW, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Lior Abraham (“Abraham”) appeals the district court’s grant of summary

judgment in favor of State Farm Insurance Company (“State Farm”) on his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Ronald Lee Gilman, United States Circuit Judge for the Court of Appeals, 6th Circuit, sitting by designation. California state-law claims for breach of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.