State of Nebraska v. Julie A. Su

Good Law
121 F.4th 1
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 5, 202423-15179California16,195 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STATE OF NEBRASKA; STATE OF No. 23-15179

IDAHO; STATE OF INDIANA;

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, D.C. No. 2:22-cv- 00213-JJT Plaintiffs-Appellants, and

OPINION

STATE OF ARIZONA; MARK

BRNOVICH, Attorney General, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Arizona,

Plaintiffs, v.

JULIE A. SU, in her official capacity as U.S. Secretary of Labor; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Wage & Hour Division; JOSEPH R. BIDEN, in his official capacity as President of the United States; JESSICA LOOMAN, in her official capacity as Acting Administrator of the U.S. Department of Labor, Wage & Hour Division,

Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona John Joseph Tuchi, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 6, 2024 San Francisco, California

Filed November 5, 2024

Before: Ryan D. Nelson, Danielle J. Forrest, and Gabriel P. Sanchez, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge R. Nelson; Concurrence by Judge R. Nelson; Dissent by Judge Sanchez

SUMMARY *

Minimum Wage Mandate / Federal Property and Administrative Services…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.