People v. Clark CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 5, 2024C099592California2,346 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 11/5/24 P. v. Clark CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Placer) ----

THE PEOPLE, C099592

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 62-191843)

v.

BRANDON ALLAN CLARK,

Defendant and Appellant.

A jury found defendant Brandon Allan Clark guilty of inflicting corporal injury on a current or former dating partner and two drug offenses. Defendant appeals, arguing the corporal injury conviction lacked sufficient evidence to support a finding he was in a dating relationship with the victim. He also argues the prosecution committed prosecutorial error during closing argument by framing his relationship with the victim as “ ‘on and off’ ” despite defense counsel’s failure to make a timely objection. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.