People v. Marroquin CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 5, 2024B332581California947 words

Opinion

Opinion

Stone, J.

DISCUSSION

“Section 1473.7 permits noncitizens to vacate convictions after they are no longer in criminal custody based on a failure to understand adverse immigration consequences of their convictions.” (People v. Singh (2022) 81 Cal.App.5th 147, 151-152 (Singh).) Marroquin argues, and the People concede, that the superior court erred in summarily denying Marroquin’s section 1473.7 motion without holding a hearing on the merits. We agree that, based on a recent amendment to section 1473.7, Marroquin was entitled to a hearing. We review de novo whether the superior court followed proper procedures in deciding a section 1473.7 motion. (People v.

The People note Marroquin did not provide transcripts from the underlying trial proceedings, but such records need not be provided when a defendant appeals from a postjudgment order. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.320(d).) Marroquin satisfied the requirement to provide a transcript of the original sentencing proceeding (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.320(d)(2)), and there was no reported hearing on the section 1473.7 motion; it was denied by the superior court in chambers. We granted Marroquin’s motion to augment the record to include the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.