In Re: Glen Littleton v. Elon Musk

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 6, 202423-16010California931 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 6 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: TESLA, INC., SECURITIES No. 23-16010

LITIGATION,

______________________________ D.C. No. 3:18-cv-04865-EMC

GLEN LITTLETON, Lead Plaintiff,

MEMORANDUM*

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

ELON MUSK; TESLA, INC.; BRAD W.

BUSS; ROBYN DENHOLM; IRA

EHRENPREIS; ANTONIO J. GRACIAS;

JAMES MURDOCH; KIMBAL MUSK;

LINDA JOHNSON RICE,

Defendants-Appellees, ______________________________

SILVER LAKE TECHNOLOGY

MANAGEMENT, L.L.C.,

Intervenor.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward M. Chen, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 25, 2024 San Francisco, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Before: CLIFTON, SUNG, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Lead plaintiff Glen Littleton appeals the district court’s denial of his motion

for a new trial and for judgment as a matter of law. We have jurisdiction under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.