California Association for the Preservation of Gam v. Stanislaus County

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 6, 202423-15975California1,186 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

NOV 6 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION FOR THE No. 23-15975

PRESERVATION OF GAMEFOWL,

D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 1:20-cv-01294-ADA-SAB

v.

COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Judge Ana I. de Alba, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 23, 2024 San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS, WARDLAW, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

The California Association for the Preservation of Gamefowl (“CAAPG”)

appeals the district court’s Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) dismissal of its

42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the County of Stanislaus (“County”) for enacting a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. county zoning ordinance outlawing the non-commercial ownership of roosters

within certain areas of the County. We affirm.

Because the parties are familiar with the factual and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.