California Association for the Preservation of Gam v. Stanislaus County
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 6, 202423-15975California1,186 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
NOV 6 2024
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION FOR THE No. 23-15975
PRESERVATION OF GAMEFOWL,
D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 1:20-cv-01294-ADA-SAB
v.
COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Judge Ana I. de Alba, Presiding
Argued and Submitted October 23, 2024 San Francisco, California
Before: S.R. THOMAS, WARDLAW, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.
The California Association for the Preservation of Gamefowl (“CAAPG”)
appeals the district court’s Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) dismissal of its
42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the County of Stanislaus (“County”) for enacting a
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. county zoning ordinance outlawing the non-commercial ownership of roosters
within certain areas of the County. We affirm.