Alejandra Nieto Bastida v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 6, 202420-70528California671 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 6 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALEJANDRA NIETO BASTIDA, No. 20-70528

Petitioner, Agency No. A208-929-170

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 4, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: GOULD, SUNG, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Alejandra Nieto Bastida petitions for review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of her appeal of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). of her motion to reopen her in absentia removal order.1 We have jurisdiction

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the BIA’s dismissal of an appeal of an IJ’s

denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion. See Hernandez-Galand v.

Garland,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.