Hastings

Hastings v. Kevorkian CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 6, 2024B312056California6,319 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chavez, J.

Filed 11/6/24 Hastings v. Kevorkian CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

LISA HASTINGS, B312056

Plaintiff, Cross-defendant (Los Angeles County and Respondent, Super. Ct. Nos. EC064909,

EC066975)

v.

ABRAHAM KEVORKIAN,

Defendant, Cross- complainant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment and orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, John Kralik, Judge. Affirmed.

Abraham Kevorkian, in pro. per., for Defendant, Cross- complainant and Appellant.

Mazur & Mazur and Janice R. Mazur for Plaintiff, Cross- defendant and Respondent. Abraham Kevorkian (appellant) appeals from a judgment in favor of Lisa Hastings (respondent) that resolved disputes concerning easement…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.