Vernon Fifty Two v. Barani CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 6, 2024B331706California5,749 words

Opinion

Opinion

Adams, J.

Filed 11/6/24 Vernon Fifty Two v. Barani CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

VERNON FIFTY TWO, LLC, B331706

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC424856) v.

AZAR BARANI,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from post-judgment orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Jon R. Takasugi, Judge. Affirmed. Law Office of Lyle F. Middleton and Lyle F. Middleton for Defendant and Appellant. Graham Law, Alice M. Graham; and Eli Melamed for Plaintiff and Respondent. ‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗ Defendant Azar Barani appeals the court’s post-judgment orders denying her motion to vacate the judgment and her ex parte motion to stay enforcement of the writ of execution…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.