KPMC

KPMC v. Chaudhari CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 6, 2024B326029California5,118 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 11/6/24 KPMC v. Chaudhari CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

KPMC, LLC, B326029

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 21STCV31781) v.

VELJIBHAI CHAUDHARI et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, William F. Fahey, Judge. Affirmed. Law Offices of Thomas J. Tedesco, Thomas J. Tedesco; Law Crafters Legal Services, Inc. and Alan M. Goldberg for Defendants and Appellants. Lagasse Branch Bell + Kinkead and Christopher C. Cianci for Plaintiff and Respondent.

‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗ Defendants Veljibhai Chaudhari and Sushilkumar Chaudhari (the Chaudharis) appeal from a judgment entered in favor of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.