Vera Carreon v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 7, 202423-1124California906 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 7 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GELASIO VERA CARREON, No. 23-1124 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-313-869 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 4, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW, HURWITZ, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Gelasio Vera Carreon (“Vera”), a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision denying his motion to

terminate removal proceedings for lack of jurisdiction and dismissing an appeal from

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the denial by an immigration judge (“IJ”) of his applications for cancellation of

removal, asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.