Menzer
Menzer v. U.S. Bancorp
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
NOV 7 2024
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ROBERT MENZER, No. 23-3075
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:23-CV-00299-MMD-
CLB
v.
U.S. BANK, N.A., et al., MEMORANDUM*
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda Du, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 24, 2024** San Francisco, California
Before: S.R. THOMAS, WARDLAW, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.
Partial Concurrence by Judge Collins.
Robert Menzer (“Menzer”) appeals the district court’s dismissal of his
complaint on the basis of claim preclusion. “We review de novo a district court's
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). dismissal based on res judicata.” Stewart v. U.S. Bancorp., 297 F.3d 953, 956 (9th
Cir. 2002). We can affirm on any grounds supported by the…