Jean Van Den Heuvel v. Walmart Supercenter
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 7, 202423-15976California466 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 7 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JEAN MARC VAN DEN HEUVEL, No. 23-15976
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00249-DJC-JDP v.
WALMART SUPERCENTER; KAREN MEMORANDUM*
ROBERTS, Walmart counsel,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Daniel J. Calabretta, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 5, 2024** San Francisco, California
Before: GOULD, SUNG, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Jean Marc Van den Heuvel appeals pro se the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint for failing to comply with Rule 8(a)(2) of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we
affirm.
1. Rule 8(a)(2) requires “a short and…