Jean Van Den Heuvel v. Walmart Supercenter

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 7, 202423-15976California466 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 7 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JEAN MARC VAN DEN HEUVEL, No. 23-15976

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00249-DJC-JDP v.

WALMART SUPERCENTER; KAREN MEMORANDUM*

ROBERTS, Walmart counsel,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Daniel J. Calabretta, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 5, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: GOULD, SUNG, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Jean Marc Van den Heuvel appeals pro se the district court’s order

dismissing his complaint for failing to comply with Rule 8(a)(2) of the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we

affirm.

1. Rule 8(a)(2) requires “a short and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.