James Lawrence, Jr. v. Star Protection Agency LLC

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 7, 202423-35234California696 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 7 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAMES ANDREW LAWRENCE, Jr., No. 23-35234

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00299-LK

v.

MEMORANDUM*

STAR PROTECTION AGENCY LLC,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Lauren J. King, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 5, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: GOULD, SUNG, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

James A. Lawrence, Jr. (“Lawrence”) appeals the district court’s grant of

Star Protection Agency LLC’s (“Star Protection”) summary judgment motion.

Lawrence alleges that the district court erred when it determined that Lawrence

had failed to demonstrate a genuine issue for trial for his claims under the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Americans with Disabilities…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.