Ali Poorsina v. Tan Tseng

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 7, 202423-15430California820 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 7 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALI R. POORSINA, No. 23-15430

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-09122-VC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

TAN TSENG; TERRENZ KUKANT CAM;

BOI ANH HONG; KEVIN TU CAM,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Vince Chhabria, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 5, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: GOULD, SUNG, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Appellant Ali Poorsina appeals the district court’s dismissal of his complaint

due to his failure to state a claim and denial of his two post-judgment Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 59(e) motions for reconsideration. We have jurisdiction

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.

1. We review de…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.