Ali Poorsina v. Tan Tseng
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 7, 202423-15430California820 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 7 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ALI R. POORSINA, No. 23-15430
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-09122-VC
v.
MEMORANDUM*
TAN TSENG; TERRENZ KUKANT CAM;
BOI ANH HONG; KEVIN TU CAM,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Vince Chhabria, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 5, 2024** San Francisco, California
Before: GOULD, SUNG, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.
Appellant Ali Poorsina appeals the district court’s dismissal of his complaint
due to his failure to state a claim and denial of his two post-judgment Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 59(e) motions for reconsideration. We have jurisdiction
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.
1. We review de…