Kelso

(PC) Puckett v. Kelso

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 7, 20241:23-cv-00054California752 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DURRELL ANTHONY PUCKETT, Case No. 1:23-cv-00054-KES-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO

RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

v. AMEND AND MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY

DISMISSAL

J. BARRIOS, et al.,

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO REFILE

Defendants. MISFILED PLEADING (Doc. No. 92, 96) 17 18 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Durrell Anthony Puckett’s Motion to Amend filed October 21, 2024. (Doc. No. 92). Plaintiff’s Motion is accompanied by a lodged fourth amended complaint. (Doc. No. 93). Plaintiff proceeds on his third amended complaint that alleges an Eighth Amendment conditions of confinement claim against Defendants Baraona, J. Barrios, Gaxiola, T. Campbell, White, and Hernandez. (Doc. No. 73). To the extent discernable in his lodged fourth amended complaint, Plaintiff seeks to add a new defendant, K. Allison as a defendant, and seeks to allege an Eighth Amendment medical…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.