Hugger
Hugger v. Aramark Campus LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 ANTHONY HUGGER, Case No. 1:24-CV-00410-KES-BAM Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS v. (Doc. 9) ARAMARK CAMPUS LLC, JOHN
PICKETT,
12 Defendants. 13 14 Defendant Aramark Campus LLC (“Aramark”) moved to dismiss all claims against it on May 21, 2024. Doc. 9. On May 23, 2024, Defendant John Pickett joined in Aramark’s motion to dismiss. Doc. 13. On June 4, 2024, Plaintiff Anthony Hugger filed an opposition, Doc. 14, and Aramark replied on June 14, 2024, Doc. 15. The Court took the motion under submission without oral argument. Hugger asserts four claims against Aramark under Title VII: for discrimination, harassment, retaliation, and wrongful termination. Doc. 1. Hugger asserts one claim against Pickett for harassment under Title VII. Id. Defendants move for dismissal of all claims as time barred. Doc. 9-1 at 6. I. BACKGROUND AND FACTS1 Hugger was hired by Aramark in April 2022. Doc. 1 at ¶ 22. In or around March…