Aramark
(PC) Cuellar v. Aramark
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TRAVIS JUSTIN CUELLAR, No. 1:24-cv-01196-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR COURT ORDER
v. (ECF No. 7) ARAMARK, et al.,
Defendants.
16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the instant action on October 4, 2024. (ECF No. 1.) On October 8, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $405.00 filing fee for this action within forty-five days. (ECF No. 3.) The Court also sent Plaintiff the proper application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner. (Id.) On October 18, 2024, Plaintiff filed an application and declaration in response to the Court’s October 8, 2024, order. Plaintiff declared and requested that the Court accept his attached in forma pauperis application because the facility in which he is detained “does not have litigation coordinator and just so happens to lose and/or…