(PC) Hunter v. Sacramento County

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRANDON EUGENE HUNTER, Case No. 2:22-cv-1520-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER; FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

SACRAMENTO COUNTY, Defendant. 16 17 On August 8, 2024, defendant filed a motion to compel. ECF No. 29. Plaintiff failed to timely file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion. Therefore, on October 7, 2024, I ordered plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to prosecute. ECF No. 30. In the order, I notified plaintiff that his failure to respond to the order would constitute a failure to comply with a court order and would result in dismissal of this case. Plaintiff has not responded to the order to show cause, and the time to do so has passed. Accordingly, dismissal of the action is warranted. The court has the inherent power to control its docket and may, in the exercise of that power, impose sanctions where appropriate, including dismissal. Bautista v. Los…