(PC) Maldonado v. Mule Creek State Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 7, 20242:23-cv-02008California535 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BILLY RAY SHANEE MALDONADO, No. 2:23-cv-02008-DAD-SCR (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

MULE CREEK STATE PRISON, et al., MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS

Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 9, 11)

17 Plaintiff Billy Ray Shanee Maldonado is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 16, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 9) be denied because: (1) he is subject to the three strikes bar under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); and (2) the allegations of plaintiff’s complaint do not satisfy the “imminent danger of serious physical injury” exception to § 1915(g). (Doc. No. 11 at 2–4) (citing Andrews v. Cervantes, 493…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.