Birtwell

(PC) Harrison v. Birtwell

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 7, 20242:24-cv-01413California1,138 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL HARRISON, No. 2:24-cv-1413 CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER BIRTWELL, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a federal inmate, proceeds in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Plaintiff seeks to stay this action pending his transfer to a new prison and receipt of his legal documents so that he may file an amended complaint. As discussed below, plaintiff’s motion for stay is denied without prejudice, and he is granted sixty days in which to file an amended complaint. I. BACKGROUND This action was filed on May 17, 2024. (ECF No. 1.) On August 5, 2024, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to amend within thirty days. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff failed to timely file an amended complaint. On September 12, 2024, the Court recommended that this action be dismissed, and ordered plaintiff to file objections…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.