Pro 49 Development, LLC v. Ness Express 1, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 PRO 49 DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a No. 2:24-cv-01850-JAM-JDP California limited liability company, Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS
v. NESS EXPRESS 1, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; ADAM DECKER, an individual; JOSEPH DECKER, an individual, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Before the Court is Defendants Adam Decker and Joseph Decker’s (collectively, the “Deckers”) motion to dismiss. See Mot., ECF No. 22. Pro 49 Development (“Plaintiff”) opposes. See Opp’n, ECF No. 24. The Deckers reply. See Reply, ECF No. 26. For the following reasons, Defendants’ motion is DENIED.1 I. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff originally filed suit in the Superior Court of California, County of Placer. See Notice of Removal, ECF No. 1. Defendants then properly removed the case to federal court under
1This motion was determined to be suitable for decision without oral argument. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g). The hearing…