Reed

Christopher Harbridge v. Reed

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 8, 202422-55861California3,853 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 8 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHRISTOPHER HARBRIDGE, No. 22-55861

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:07-cv-04486-GW-AS v.

REED, Captain in Charge of Facility-C, MEMORANDUM*

CSP-LAC,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER; et al.,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California George H. Wu, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 7, 2023 San Francisco, California

Before: COLLINS, FORREST, and SUNG, Circuit Judges. Dissent by Judge COLLINS.

Plaintiff-Appellant Christopher Harbridge appeals the district court’s grant

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. of summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee Reed in Harbridge’s state

prison 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging First Amendment retaliation. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review a district court’s grant or denial of

summary judgment de novo.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.