In re Rylee P. CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 8, 2024A170618California6,144 words

Opinion

Opinion

Miller, J.

Filed 11/8/24 In re Rylee P. CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

In re Rylee P., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

SAN FRANCISCO HUMAN

SERVICES AGENCY,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A170618

v. Richard B., (San Francisco County Super. Ct. No. JD233085) Defendant and Appellant.

Richard B. (Father) appeals from juvenile court orders terminating his parental rights to his one-year-old daughter Rylee P. (Minor) after a hearing pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26.1 Father also purports to appeal from orders summarily denying a petition he filed under section 388 to allow visitation with minor. He raises three arguments: first, the juvenile court erred when it summarily denied two petitions he filed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.