Eslick
(PC) Nuno v. Eslick
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GUILLERMO NUNO, No. 1:21-cv-00769-KES-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUR-REPLY
v. (ECF No. 110) D. ESLICK, et al. Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 8, 2024, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 82.) After receiving three extensions of time, Plaintiff filed an opposition on August 2, 2024, and Defendants filed a reply on September 20, 2024. (ECF Nos. 106, 109.) Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for leave and copy of a sur-reply, filed October 7, 2024. (ECF No. 110.) Defendants did not file an opposition and the time to do has passed. Local Rule 230(l). The Local Rules provide for a motion, an opposition, and a reply. See Local Rule 230(l). There is nothing in the Local Rules or the Federal Rules that provides the right to file a sur-reply. 27 …