Muniz

(PC) Cisneros v. Muniz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20241:22-cv-01601California706 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL CISNEROS, Case No. 1:22-cv-01601-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT

PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO

v. PROSECUTE1 JUAN MUNIZ, et al., Defendants.

16 17 Plaintiff Daniel Cisneros initiated this action as a state prisoner by filing a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and proceeds on his Second Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 13, “SAC”). For the reasons set forth below, the Court dismisses this action consistent with this Court’s Local Rules for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this action. BACKGROUND On August 19, 2024, the undersigned issued an order granting Defendants’ motion for extension of time. (Doc. No. 39). On September 3, 2024, the mail containing the Order was returned “Undeliverable, Return to Sender, Not Deliverable as Addressed, Unable to Forward.”

1 1 Both parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge, in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.