Al-Mansur
Al-Mansur v. County of Alameda
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SABIR AL-MANSUR, Case No. 24-cv-06909-AMO
Plaintiff,
ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING
v. AND ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 18, 19, 22, 23, 34 Defendants.
12 Before the Court are several administrative motions that are now ripe for decision. Having reviewed the parties’ papers as well as relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the Court rules as follows. A. Defendants’ Motion to Change Time to File Responsive Pleading On October 25, 2024, Defendants County of Alameda, Henry C. Levy, Julie P. Manaois, Theody Virrey, and Shahidah J. Williams (“Defendants”)1 together moved to extend the deadline to file a responsive pleading under Civil Local Rule 6-3. ECF 18. Defendants additionally move for the Court to impose a scheduling order on the motion to change time. ECF 19. In light of Plaintiff Sabir Al-Mansour’s opposition filings (see ECF 27, ECF 28, ECF 29), the Court finds a 22 …