IN RE: CHROMACODE LITIGATION

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20245:23-cv-04823California2,985 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 CHROMACODE, INC., et al., Case No. 23-cv-04823-EKL (VKD)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING

v. CHROMACODE’S MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO AMEND INVALIDITY

BIO-RAD LABORATORIES, INC., CONTENTIONS Defendant. Re: Dkt. No.

13 In connection with its invalidity defenses against patents asserted by defendant and counter-plaintiff Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. (“Bio-Rad”), plaintiff and counter-defendant ChromaCode, Inc. (“ChromaCode”) seeks leave to amend its invalidity contentions to add contentions identifying three claim terms as indefinite. Dkt. No. 68; see Dkt. No. 40 at 6. Bio- Rad opposes the motion. Dkt. No. 74. The Court held a hearing on the motion on September 17, 2024. Dkt. No. 81. For the reasons explained below, the Court grants ChromaCode’s motion for leave to amend. I. BACKGROUND In its counterclaim in this patent infringement action, Bio-Rad asserts infringement…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.